• Wed. Feb 21st, 2024

North East Connected

Hopping Across The North East From Hub To Hub

Why are famous cats nothing like real cats?

pexels-miguel-á-padriñán-932261

By Dr Rebecca Rose Stanton, Fellow of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics

Even if someone sucks at general knowledge, if asked to name a famous cat, they’ll be able to come up with something. Top Cat. The Pink Panther. Felix. There are plenty to choose from. But tweaking the question to asking for a famous cat that isn’t anthropomorphised, and things become tougher. Basically, despite the prevalence of cats in the human world, famous cats in popular culture are almost always anthropomorphised.

Consider Hello Kitty. You don’t need to have a youngster in your life to come across its cute image. For example, earlier this year Hello Kitty formed part of Kim Kardashian’s manicure and singer Dua Lipa wore a Hello Kitty bikini. The waving white cat is everywhere. Just like real cats. But Hello Kitty doesn’t have that much in common with real house cats: she is bipedal, wears clothes, and is clawless.

The intense anthropomorphism of cats in the media is not the case for other popular species. If you had to name a famous dog, it’s likely you’ll choose one from movies or TV, but the chances are you’ll go for Lassie, Toto or Rin Tin Tin rather than straight to Scooby Doo or Deputy Dawg. Famous horses? Black Beauty, Silver and Champion – all fictional but all created as real (albeit exceptional) horses.

However, this is logical given that such species have been selectively bred over thousands of years to look and act exactly as humans want them to. For example, a Labrador has been repeatedly adapted by humanity to suit our, and our ancestors’, tastes. That’s why we often see dogs behaving naturally in films and on television. Cats are slightly different in this respect. Yes, house cats have evolved alongside humans, but in a different way from dogs and horses. For example, whilst dogs were welcomed into human homes to provide protection, and, later, companionship, cats were often kept outside the home so that they could keep rodents away from food stores. Therefore, humans selectively bred dogs to suit the home, which they didn’t do with cats. Secondly, unlike almost all other domesticated species, cats are out-and-out carnivores. As such, they possess an overwhelming instinct to hunt, which is why they spend much of their time chasing and killing smaller animals, a practice that most humans cannot relate to. This is again why cat behaviour differs from the likes of dogs and horses.

These points highlight why the world’s most famous cats are all anthropomorphised, yet famous dogs are a mix of real and anthropomorphised. Essentially it is because there are certain animalistic behaviours in cats that humans dislike and wish to attenuate. Animation, merchandise, and many other areas of popular culture reflect the world that humans want, rather than what is accurate. This is why Hello Kitty, a heavily anthropomorphised animated cat, commands the popularity she does. This is also why in the media, pro-social animals only exhibit certain behaviours, such as a dog catching a ball, yet rarely other behaviours, such as dogs mating. The ball catching is anthropomorphised; the mating is animalistic. Therefore, humans prefer the dog catching the ball for the same reason that they prefer Hello Kitty over a real cat.

Hello Kitty, Top Cat, and Garfield are examples of how cats are commonly characterised as pro-social. However, there are countless numbers of anti-social cats depicted in the media too. The difference between the two is almost always in their anthropomorphism, appearance, and behaviour. For example, cats like Hello Kitty do not scratch or hiss (in most cases, they do not even seem to have claws), whereas antagonistic cats, such as Tom in Tom and Jerry, often do.

Anti-social cats often don’t wear clothes, speak English, or walk on two legs. What this means, however, is that anti-social cats are usually more cat-like than their pro-social counterparts. This point isn’t just true of cats and can be seen with several other species in the media too. For example, in animation, antagonistic animals are often non-anthropomorphised rodents, reptiles, and other wild, frequently carnivorous species. They often exhibit behaviours that are natural to these animals, such as biting, hissing, or scratching, which are presented in an anti-social way. In contrast, pro-social animal characters tend to be highly anthropomorphised species that viewers are familiar with, such as dogs, exhibiting human-like behaviours. Therefore, despite the popularity of cats in human culture, it is not enough for a cat just to be a cat, our entertainment media requires it to also shed its more animalistic traits for humans to be sure to like it, as is evident with Hello Kitty, Top Cat, Felix the Cat and so on.

The closer a fictional cat is to a real cat, the more likely it is associated with villainy. Ask someone to mime a Bond villain, and they will almost certainly pretend to stroke a cat. However, whilst the association of cats with villainy is sometimes comic in nature, it is believed to have serious consequences for real cats. For example, cats are frequently victims of domestic animal harm. Furthermore, specific types of cats are vilified more than others. For instance, it is well documented that black cats are less likely to be adopted from animal shelters, perhaps because of the common pairing of black cats and witches in the media. This may also be why popular pro-social cats, such as Hello Kitty, are white.

Therefore, even though negative depictions of cats are often set in fictional worlds, they are exclusively consumed by those who live in this world, a world that is home to millions of real and very cat-like cats.

The media often implies that if a cat uses their claws, or in fact even has claws, then they’re a villain, rather than just a typical cat. However, hissing, scratching, and chasing mice are all natural behaviours of cats; it is perhaps because humans cannot relate to such behaviours that they have chosen to vilify them rather than celebrate them. That is why Hello Kitty looks and acts like she does; she embodies what humans want cats to be like. If she didn’t, she wouldn’t be the most recognisable cat in the world. Similarly, all the dogs that didn’t look and act as humans wanted them too are long extinct for the same reason.

On a brighter note, more recent media releases suggest that positive change could be on the way for our furry feline friends. For instance, Puss in Boots from the Shrek series, a cat that has both pro and anti-social qualities, has had three spin-off movies due to his phenomenal popularity. As a cat character, he doesn’t fit comfortably into either the hero or villain role, suggesting that the next generation might prefer a more nuanced portrayal of such animals. Given the negative effects that past depictions of cats have had on them, these signs of progress can only be a good thing for both humans and the many real animals we share our world with.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dr Rebecca Rose Stanton is author of ‘The Disneyfication of Animals’ and a Fellow of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, an independent centre pioneering ethical perspectives on animals through academic research, teaching, and publication. The Centre comprises more than 100 academic Fellows worldwide. www.oxfordanimalethics.com/home

Web: www.oxfordanimalethics.com/home

Instagram: @oxfordanimalethics

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@oxfordanimalethics

LinkedIn: Dr Clair Linzey – https://www.linkedin.com/in/clair-linzey-ab012272/

By mac